Tjaša Knific

Tjaša Knific is a master’s graduate physiotherapist, Development Associate and head of the physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep research group at the National Institute of Public Health (NIJZ) in Slovenia. She brings expertise in movement behaviours, health promotion, and preventive programs, supporting cities, communities, and professionals to embed physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep into everyday life. She advises on public health strategies, active mobility, and healthy ageing, and has authored numerous professional and scientific publications.

The GIB24 project
The 24-hour movement behaviour paradigm is gaining momentum internationally. From your perspective, what makes this framework so powerful – and how do you see it transforming the way cities think about health, mobility, and daily life?

The strength of the 24-hour movement behaviour paradigm lies in its simplicity and realism. It is based on a basic fact: every day has only 24 hours, and time spent in one behaviour inevitably replaces time spent in another. Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep are therefore not separate lifestyle choices, but an interconnected system that shapes health across the entire day.

This perspective moves us beyond a narrow focus on exercise as an “isolated action” and encourages cities to consider how daily routines are organised: how people move, work, commute, and rest. From an urban point of view, this is transformative. It links health directly to mobility systems, housing design, public spaces, work environments, and digital habits. A city that promotes walking but simultaneously undermines sleep through noise, long commuting times, or irregular work patterns cannot be considered truly health-supportive.

The paradigm is also powerful because it reframes health promotion from “doing more” to “using time more wisely.” Small, realistic shifts—such as breaking up prolonged sitting or supporting regular sleep patterns—can lead to meaningful health benefits, particularly for people who struggle to meet traditional exercise guidelines. For cities, this opens the way for inclusive, population-wide strategies that embed health into everyday life rather than placing the burden solely on individual choice.

In the GIB24 project, Slovenia developed its first national 24-hour movement guidelines for adults. How do these guidelines reframe what a “healthy day” looks like, and what insights from the project might inspire other European cities? 

With the GIB24 project, Slovenia developed its first national 24-hour movement guidelines for adults, marking a shift from fragmented recommendations toward an integrated understanding of a “healthy day.” In this framework, a healthy day is not defined by a single behaviour, but by achieving sufficient physical activity across different intensities, limited and interrupted sedentary time, and adequate, regular sleep. Importantly, the guidelines emphasise that these behaviours interact: improving one at the expense of another—such as increasing activity while sacrificing sleep—may not lead to better health outcomes.

One key insight from GIB24 that may inspire other European cities is the strong link between guidelines, monitoring, and practice. Slovenia did not stop at issuing recommendations; it embedded 24-hour movement behaviours into national surveillance and developed practical tools for counselling and health promotion. This creates a bridge between policy, data, and everyday implementation.

For cities, this approach highlights the importance of coherence: guidelines should inform urban design, mobility planning, workplace policies, and local health programmes, while data should be used to track whether these environments truly enable healthier daily routines.

We often focus on inactivity as a fitness issue, but its implications are much broader. What hidden or underestimated health impacts of sedentary lifestyles should urban practitioners pay more attention to -including those affecting mental health, community connectedness, or ageing? 

Sedentary behaviour is often framed as the opposite of exercise, but its health implications go far beyond physical fitness. Prolonged sitting is associated with increased risk of chronic diseases even among people who meet physical activity recommendations, which makes it a distinct public health issue rather than merely a lack of exercise.

Less visible, but equally important, are the mental and social consequences. From an urban perspective, environments that encourage sedentary behaviour unintentionally reinforce social isolation and weaken community connections.

For ageing populations, sedentary lifestyles have additional implications. Extended sedentary behaviour contributes to functional decline, loss of balance, and increased fall risk, which directly affect independence and quality of life.

Urban practitioners should therefore pay closer attention to how cities shape patterns of sitting and movement throughout the day: in housing design, public transport, public spaces, and neighbourhood services.

From an urban perspective, environments that encourage sedentary behaviour unintentionally reinforce social isolation and weaken community connections.

Cities across Europe want to integrate 24h movement principles, but many struggle to turn them into concrete policies or design choices. From your experience at the National Institute of Public Health, what are the biggest barriers and the most important enablers for embedding the 24h movement behaviour framework into public health and urban planning?

One of the main barriers to embedding the 24-hour movement behaviour framework into policy and planning is persistent sectoral thinking. Physical activity, transport, housing, work, and environmental planning are often addressed in isolation, while the 24-hour perspective requires coordinated action across these domains. Sedentary behaviour and sleep also remain relatively “invisible” in urban policy, as they are less tangible and harder to translate into concrete design standards than active mobility infrastructure.

From our experience at the National Institute of Public Health, a key enabler is the development of a shared language and shared indicators across sectors. When the 24-hour movement framework is supported by population-level data, it becomes easier to justify interventions, set priorities, and evaluate impact.

Practical, cross-sectoral examples are equally important. In Slovenia, long-term collaboration between public health and urban planning experts—such as initiatives promoting everyday contact with green and open spaces—shows how urban environments can support movement, reduce sedentary time, and enhance mental well-being.

Finally, strong political commitment to the “health in all policies” approach is essential. When health is recognised as a co-benefit of mobility, urban design, and environmental policies, the framework becomes an integrative tool rather than an additional burden.

What would your ideal mobility-healthy city of 2035 look like?

My ideal mobility-healthy city in 2035 is one where healthy movement is a natural part of everyday life. Daily routines include walking, cycling, and active travel, while prolonged sitting and excessive commuting time are minimised. The city offers safe streets, accessible public transport, and inviting green public spaces, and is age-inclusive, enabling people of all generations to stay active, independent, and well.

More articles

Urban Voices

Daniela Patti on… urban resilience in the face of pandemics...

Daniela Patti on… urban ...

Daniela Patti on… urban resilience in the face of pandemics

The EUKN interviewed Daniela Patti, Director of Eutropian, about what the COVID-19 outbreak is teaching us about urban resilience as lived reality.

Pact of Amsterdam
Publications

One year: Pact of Amsterdam...

One year: Pact of Amsterdam...

One year: Pact of Amsterdam

Investigating the implementation of the Urban Agenda for the EU’s Partnership actions, as well as their impacts and spin-off effects, a year on from their launch with the Pact of Amsterdam.

Urban Voices

Heather Brooks on… the Nature Restoration Law...

Heather Brooks on… the N...

Heather Brooks on… the Nature Restoration Law

Heather Brooks discusses implementing the nature restoration law and what it may mean for the future of cities.