Martin Grisel

Interest in local politics and wider societal challenges led Martin to switch careers and focus on urban development policy, founding the EUKN in 2005. Convinced that cities are one of mankind's most fascinating creations, Martin is driven to create more sustainable urban futures through co-designing strategy with policymakers and researchers. He enjoys working as a trusted strategic advisor to policymakers from local to global level, and is proud to work with a team of highly dedicated colleagues.

International Building Exhibition (IBA)
You serve on the IBA advisory board, the ‘Kuratorium’. Could you explain what an IBA is, and what makes it such a unique platform for urban innovation and experimentation?

IBA – in English International Building Exhibition – is a time-limited, mission-oriented framework for urban and regional innovation. Rather than a conventional exhibition, it functions as a real-world laboratory in which cities, regions and partners test new approaches to pressing spatial, social, economic and environmental challenges. IBAs typically run for ten years or more and combine a clear strategic theme with a curated portfolio of projects, policies and processes. What distinguishes an IBA is its emphasis on experimentation under real conditions: new forms of governance, planning instruments, financing models and design solutions are developed and implemented in practice, not only discussed. An IBA brings together public authorities, private actors, civil society and researchers, often with a dedicated organisation that coordinates, curates quality and safeguards ambition. Successful IBAs go beyond producing exemplary buildings or places. Their real value lies in creating transferable knowledge, changing institutional routines and leaving a durable legacy after the IBA organisation itself is dissolved. This requires strong political backing, delivery capacity and early planning for what will remain once the exhibition phase ends. When these conditions are met, IBAs can act as powerful catalysts for systemic urban transformation. When they are not, they risk becoming short-lived branding exercises or collections of isolated showcase projects.

At this year’s IBA Day, you participated in discussions on knowledge exchange and peer-to-peer cooperation. Based on your experience in international collaboration, what lessons or best practices from other European cities could help accelerate active mobility in metropolitan regions like Munich, and how can these be adapted locally?

The IBA in the Munich metropolitan region is a format under negotiation. The topic “space for mobility” relies on the interconnection between sustainable urban mobility, spatial planning and housing. Innovative mobility in the Munich metropolitan region today primarily means systemic change rather than isolated solutions: more space for cycling and walking, less dominance of the private car, a strong role for public transport, and intelligent digital integration of services. European examples such as the 15-minute city approach in Paris, the integrated digital mobility services in Helsinki, Amsterdam’s and Utrecht’s bike-friendly strategies, and Barcelona’s superblocks show that active mobility, Mobility-as-a-Service and zero-emission strategies work, when implemented consistently. For Munich, the key lies above all in close cooperation between the city and its surrounding region: suburban rail, cycling highways, fare integration, logistics and charging infrastructure must be conceived as a shared project of the entire metropolitan region.

Innovation in mobility often requires coordination across sectors and administrations. How can public authorities, policymakers, businesses, and civil society systematically learn from successful mobility innovations and integrate them into urban planning?

In the field of mobility, it is not only technical expertise that matters, but above all methodological knowledge. This type of knowledge is conveyed through real-world laboratories, temporary traffic experiments, participatory planning, digital twins, open data use and regulatory experiments in which all actors, including public administrations, actively engage in implementation. Method transfer is successful when it is practice-oriented, iterative and sensitive to conflict. A strong culture of learning and error is crucial: setbacks, resistance and political blockages must be explicitly recognised as part of the learning process.

 

When done well, active mobility becomes a catalyst for broader urban transformation, not a niche policy for cyclists and pedestrians.

You have emphasized that innovative mobility requires systems change rather than isolated solutions. What systems-level transformation potential does active mobility hold, and how can it reshape transport, public space, and daily life in cities? 

Innovative mobility is fundamentally about systems change, and active mobility has particularly strong transformative potential because it reshapes multiple urban systems at once. Prioritising walking and cycling is not only a transport intervention; it reallocates street space, changes design standards, and redefines what public space is for. This leads to safer streets, higher-quality urban environments and improved public health, while reducing emissions, noise and car dependency. At the transport system level, active mobility works as the backbone of integrated mobility systems. It strengthens public transport by improving first- and last-mile access and enables concepts such as Mobility-as-a-Service to function at scale. When combined with digital tools, pricing reforms and zero-emission strategies, it helps shift mobility from private car ownership to shared, multimodal use. In daily life, active mobility shortens perceived distances, supports local economies and increases social interaction. Streets become places to spend time rather than corridors for traffic, benefiting children, older people and vulnerable users in particular. Crucially, these effects only materialise when active mobility is implemented consistently and at scale, across entire functional urban areas. That requires coordinated governance, long-term investment and a willingness to rethink priorities. When done well, active mobility becomes a catalyst for broader urban transformation, not a niche policy for cyclists and pedestrians.

Active mobility has been gaining momentum across Europe for some time. Could you share an example of a metropolitan region where active mobility is well integrated into urban infrastructure, and what factors do you believe have contributed to its success?

Paris illustrates how active mobility can drive systemic urban transformation when transport and urban policy are aligned around a clear vision. Guided by the concept of the 15-minute city, Paris aims to ensure that everyday destinations – work, education, shopping and healthcare – are reachable within 15 minutes on foot or by bicycle. This vision is operationalised through the ambitious Plan Vélo 2021–2026, which seeks to make all streets bicycle-friendly. In practice, Paris has built more than 1,000 kilometres of cycling infrastructure, including a dense network of protected bike lanes. Car parking in street space has been significantly reduced and repurposed for greenery, play areas and bicycle parking. Most recently, a public referendum endorsed the transformation of around 500 additional streets into low-traffic, green spaces, alongside stricter restrictions on SUVs and e-scooters. Paris demonstrates how a traditional metropolis can be systematically transformed from a car-oriented to a people-centred city. Crucially, this shift has been achieved through politically contested but consistent implementation, showing that active mobility is not a marginal transport policy but a lever for rethinking public space, everyday accessibility and urban life as a whole. It’s a great example for the Munich and other metropolitan regions.

More articles

Urban Voices

Nicola Bellini on… sustainable urban tourism...

Nicola Bellini on… susta...

Nicola Bellini on… sustainable urban tourism

Prof. Nicola Bellini, expert in charge of the ex-ante assessment of the Sustainable Tourism thematic area under the Urban Agenda for the EU, talks about cities' role in sustainable tourism and more

urban voices
Urban Voices

Lucie Greyl and Tom Wild on… Cities for Climate-Neutrality...

Lucie Greyl and Tom Wild on...

Lucie Greyl and Tom Wild on… Cities for Climate-Neutrality

This month, we introduce a new format of Urban Voices: an audio podcast experience! Listen to Lucie Greyl and Tom Wild discussing how cities and urban policies can shape a climate-neutral future.

Urban Voices

Luca de Stefano on… urban design in the context of pandemics...

Luca de Stefano on… urba...

Luca de Stefano on… urban design in the context of pandemics

'Like every young designer, we wanted to change the world. We believed our collective impact could be much bigger than one guy designing beautiful museums. And that was how Non-Architecture was born.'